• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Look first at relevant experience, top python development companies not the length of the client list. Ask for three or four projects that match your domain and your stack, and then ask specifically which engineers actually built it. A serious vendor is happy to connect you with the tech lead. Answers that name nobody at this stage generally mean the delivery team is not the team you were shown.

The agreement deserves more scrutiny than the proposal. A few clauses carry most of the weight: intellectual property assignment, non-disclosure, and termination and handover. Every artifact has to transfer to you on payment, together with documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Look closely at any clause that keeps reusable components outside the transfer, as it is usually the dependency that makes switching painful.

Ask where their numbers come from. A credible estimate comes with a list of assumptions, a breakdown by feature or module and a best case and a worst case. A fixed-bid deal only makes sense when the scope is genuinely frozen; when the scope is still moving the supplier adds a risk premium and you fund the buffer regardless. Time and materials moves the risk back to the client, so it needs a cap, regular demos and transparent reporting.

Process beats headcount. Ask what happens when the scope changes, who defines done and how testing is organised. A team should be able to demonstrate running fintech software development rather than status reports. Written acceptance criteria are the only reliable protection against an argument at delivery time.

Before signing, plan for the day you no longer need this vendor at the start rather than at the end. Ask that the code repository sits on infrastructure you own from the beginning, and that the documentation is refreshed in every sprint. A vendor with nothing to hide will agree quickly; hesitation here reveals most of what you need to know.