• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A number produced without questions is a warning, not a service level. Any serious team will come back with questions first: fintech app development about integrations. A vendor node js vs laravel performance that commits to a figure before understanding the scope is simply pricing a guess, and the gap will be corrected later — at your expense.

Look out for a gap between the people you meet and the developers actually assigned. Request specific people rather than roles in the statement of work, with wording covering replacement. A team that will only describe roles and will not commit to specific engineers is keeping the option to staff you with whoever is free.

Ask for commit-level visibility from the first week. A team that hands over nothing between demos is inviting you to accept a black box. Visible commits show you how many people are really working far better than any status report. This extends to the automated test suite: typescript web development company if there is no pipeline, assurances about quality remain just talk.

Vague contract language around code ownership is rarely an oversight. The contract must state explicitly that the code, designs and documentation belong to the client as they are paid for. Also check the governing law and the payment schedule: a request for most of the money up front with no deliverable attached removes the only leverage you have.

Finally, pay attention to how they communicate. Ask how much working-time overlap there will be with your timezone, which person handles day-to-day questions and within what time. Some genuine overlap generally works; zero overlap converts a five-minute question into a twenty-four hour round trip. Unclear written communication in the proposal will not improve later.