• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Begin with domain experience, not the length of the client list. Ask to see a couple of projects that match your domain and web development company uk your stack, and then ask who actually wrote that code. A serious vendor is happy to connect you with the people who would work on your project. Evasive answers at this stage almost always mean the delivery team is not the team you were shown.

The contract needs a slower read than the pitch. Three clauses do most of the work: intellectual property assignment, confidentiality, and exit terms and software development process handover. Everything produced should transfer to you as it is paid for, along with documentation, pipelines and deployment scripts. Look closely at language that leaves framework code in the vendor's hands, since it is usually exactly the piece that locks you in.

Ask where their numbers come from. An honest estimate is accompanied by a list of assumptions, a task-level breakdown and an explicit range. A fixed price only makes sense when the scope is genuinely frozen; when the scope is still moving the vendor prices the risk in and you pay for it anyway. Time and materials moves the risk back to the client, so it demands a cap, regular demos and transparent reporting.

How the work is run matters as much as team size. Establish what happens when the scope changes, who signs off on a feature and what the QA setup looks like. A mature team will be able to demonstrate a live build at the end of each sprint. Clear, written acceptance criteria remain the only reliable protection against the it-was-never-in-scope conversation.

Finally, plan for the handover before it becomes urgent. Ask that the code repository lives in your organisation from the beginning, and that documentation is updated as part of the work. A vendor with nothing to hide accepts it without argument; a long negotiation over it says quite a lot.